Drawing for WORLD'S SMARTEST DOG COLLAR

USPTO serial 86571065

WORLD'S SMARTEST DOG COLLAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELL, MARLENE D
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WORLD'S SMARTEST DOG COLLAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrei D. Tsygankov

ANDREI D. TSYGANKOV Bekiares Eliezer LLP2870 Peachtree Rd #512Atlanta, GA 30305UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer application software for mobile computing devices, namely, software for establishing virtual boundaries within a geographic area for electronically restraining pets; Computer software and firmware for electronically restraining, tracking and locating pets within a pre-defined geographical boundary; Computer software for creating virtual geographic boundaries; Downloadable computer software for creating virtual geographic boundariesACTIVE—
018Collars for animals; Collars for pets; Dog collars; Electronic pet collarsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 31, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 27, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 26, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 24, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 29, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 29, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 9, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 22, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 19, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 14, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 14, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 12, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 27, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 27, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 30, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 24, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance