USPTO serial 86571658
DIGITAL BLINDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELLO, ZACK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DIGITAL BLINDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kathleen S. Ansari
KATHLEEN S. ANSARI Transpacific Law Group1 Daniel Burnham Ct., #914San Francisco, CA 94109UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | Flexible polymer light-emitting surface coatings and films for use on stone, concrete, wood, metal, glass, plastic; light modulating films and surface coatings for use on stone, concrete, wood, metal, glass, plastic; progressive coatings that can change degree of shading based on exposure to light for use on stone, concrete, wood, metal, glass, plastic | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Glass and polymer windows with variable light transmission for vehicles that travel via land, water, air and space | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Information boards; printed advertising boards of paper | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | Colored and uncolored polymer film with variable light transmission; mirror and window polymer films and surface coatings with variable light transmission for the purpose of managing the flow of natural and artificial light; light sensitive materials, namely, organic and non- organic electrochromic polymer film for use on windows, screens, partitions, skylights, roofs, glass walls and window blinds with variable light transmittance | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | Nonmetal windows with variable light transmission for buildings; nonmetal window assemblies comprised of frames, sashes, sills and glass and polymer panels with variable light transmission for buildings; hatched polymer road marking studs with panoramic variable light transmission; elements of advertising structures, namely, nonmetallic window panes with variable light transmission; windows panes made of electrochromic material; glass for building, namely, privacy glass capable of varying its opacity or transparency based on variation in applied voltage | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Moveable office partitions, screens with variable light transmission for use in medical institutions; moveable partitions and wall elements with variable transmittance windows for use in residential, business and government buildings and medical institutions; printed advertising boards of wood and plastic | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VITRO FLAT GASS LLC
- Other trademarks owned by iGlass Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named DIGITAL BLINDS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2021 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 11, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 11, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 19, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2017 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2016 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Mar 14, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 1, 2016 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 10, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 27, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |