Drawing for ZATECA

USPTO serial 86572857

ZATECA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ESTELL, BRITTANY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ZATECA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jorge Arciniega

JORGE ARCINIEGA McDermott Will & Emery Llp2049 Century Park E Ste 3800Los Angeles, CA 90067-3218UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Canned vegetables and soups; dips; prepared and prepackaged meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry, pasta or vegetables; snacks, namely, soy, yucca, pasta, tortilla and bagel chips, and processed, seasoned, shelled, and salted nutsACTIVE—
031Snacks, namely, raw nutsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 9, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 8, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 21, 2018NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Mar 20, 2018DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 6, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 2, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 1, 2018DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2018ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2018EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 28, 2018EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 28, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 5, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 1, 2017EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 1, 2017EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 1, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 1, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 27, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 27, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 27, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 30, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 30, 2016NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Nov 29, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 29, 2016DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 9, 2016FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Nov 9, 2016FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2016INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
Sep 25, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 31, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 31, 2016DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Aug 31, 2016ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Aug 31, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 1, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 5, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 5, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 16, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 22, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 22, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 21, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 20, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 20, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 26, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 31, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 26, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance