USPTO serial 86572936
HANDI-CRAFT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 30, 2016
- Examiner
- FALK, JONATHAN ROBERT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with HANDI-CRAFT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $850
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Philadelphia, PA
Philadelphia, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kathryn Jennison Shultz
Kathryn Jennison Shultz JENNISON & SHULTZ PC3918 Prosperity Avenue, Suite 215FAIRFAX, VA 22031UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | FURNITURE; NON-METAL INDOOR WINDOW BLINDS AND PARTS AND FITTINGS THEREFORE; VENETIAN BLINDS; INDOOR VENETIAN WINDOW BLINDS; INDOOR WINDOW ROLLER BLINDS; INDOOR WINDOW BLACKOUT BLINDS; INDOOR MINI-BLINDS FOR WINDOWS [ ; CURTAIN TIE-BACKS IN THE NATURE OF NON-TEXTILE CURTAIN HOLDERS; DECORATIVE WINDOW FINIALS; WINDOW TRIMS AND FITTINGS NOT MADE OF METAL ] | ACTIVE | Nov 18, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2023 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2023 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Apr 10, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 30, 2022 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2016 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 27, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 25, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 14, 2016 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2016 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 13, 2016 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2016 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 8, 2016 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2016 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 8, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 18, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 26, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |