USPTO serial 86573072
COLLECTIVE INNOVATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GILLES, DEBORAH LYNN MEINERS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COLLECTIVE INNOVATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SINGAPORE, SG
FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL LTD.
SINGAPORE 486123, SG
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sabrina Stavish
SABRINA STAVISH Sheridan Ross P C1560 Broadway Ste 1200Denver, CO 80202-5145UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | CUSTOM MANUFACTURE OF ELECTRONICS FOR OTHERS; MANUFACTURING SERVICES FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF ELECTRONICS TO ORDER AND/OR SPECIFICATION OF OTHERS; TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING TECHNICAL ADVICE RELATED TO THE MANUFACTURE OF ELECTRONICS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | ENGINEERING SERVICES, CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELDS OF NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT AND ELECTRONICS; NEW PRODUCT DESIGN SERVICES; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT OF NEW PRODUCTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FLEX LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named COLLECTIVE INNOVATION
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 18, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 20, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 27, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 27, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 19, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 22, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 9, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 24, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 7, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 24, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 8, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 12, 2015 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 12, 2015 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 12, 2015 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 5, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |