USPTO serial 86574617
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Sioux Falls, SD
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicholas R. Grennan
NICHOLAS R. GRENNAN Suiter Swantz Pc Llo14301 Fnb Pkwy Ste 220Omaha, NE 68154-5299UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Global communication services, namely, providing online forums and electronic messaging between or among children, caretakers, and instructors in the field of education for children and delivered over and via global computer and wireless networks, including but not limited to the internet and mobile phone networks | ACTIVE | Aug 31, 2010 |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, providing educational content to children in the fields of language arts, reading, writing, mathematics, geography, art, using online activities, games, videos, and interactive exercises; Entertainment services, namely, providing online computer educational games in the fields of, including but not limited to, language arts, reading, writing, mathematics, geography, and art | ACTIVE | Aug 31, 2010 |
| 042 | Design and development of computer software, including but not limited to designing and developing computer software featuring educational and entertainment activities, information, and games for childhood education | ACTIVE | Aug 31, 2010 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 12, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 8, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 8, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 6, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 14, 2015 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 8, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 9, 2015 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2015 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2015 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2015 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2015 | EPEN | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY | — |
| Jul 7, 2015 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 26, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 2015 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |