USPTO serial 86576599
EQUIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EQUIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anamaria E. Cashman
SARAH E BRO MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP4 PARK PLAZASUITE 1700IRVINE, CA 92614Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software used to collect and analyze malnourishment data collected from heathcare providers through an online portal | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Providing medical record analysis of malnourishment data via a website for the purpose of providing custom tailored outputs about recommended resources and treatments associated with malnourishment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 2017 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 20, 2017 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 20, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 17, 2016 | EXDM | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT | — |
| Aug 31, 2016 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2016 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2016 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 11, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 25, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 25, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 25, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 25, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 17, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 17, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 2015 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |