Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 86576744?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/86576744. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns MOBILE CONCIERGE?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 86576744, the listed owner(s) include: Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd..

What is USPTO serial number 86576744?

Serial number 86576744 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark MOBILE CONCIERGE. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of MOBILE CONCIERGE?

MOBILE CONCIERGE (86576744) currently shows USPTO status code 601 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover MOBILE CONCIERGE?

The public record lists International Classes: 041. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

USPTO serial 86576744

MOBILE CONCIERGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601

Filing date: Mar 25, 2015
Status date: Oct 24, 2016
Registration date: —
Examiner: LUDEMAN, JESSICA ANN
Law office: TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MOBILE CONCIERGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd.
North Ryde, NSW, AU
Other trademarks owned by Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd.

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Keith D. Moore

Keith D. Moore Video Gaming Technologies, Inc.308 Mallory Station RoadFranklin, TN 37067UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
041	Entertainment related services for casinos in the nature of providing non-downloadable software for operating an online portal and social networking platform; providing temporary use of a non-downloadable web application for facilitating casino social media operations in electronic gaming machines and hand held computer devices; casino social media application services, namely, providing on-line non-downloadable software for facilitating loyalty reward programs, dining, reservations, casino marketing, promotional coupon redemption, video marketing and push notifications	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Oct 24, 2016	MAB1	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT	—
Oct 24, 2016	ABN1	ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED	—
Oct 21, 2016	EXAR	TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED	—
Jul 11, 2016	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2016	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2016	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2016	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jun 20, 2016	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jun 20, 2016	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 18, 2016	ARAA	ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 18, 2016	REAP	TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED	—
Dec 19, 2015	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2015	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2015	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 2, 2015	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Dec 1, 2015	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Dec 1, 2015	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 2, 2015	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2015	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2015	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 28, 2015	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Apr 3, 2015	NWOS	NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED	—