Drawing for WHISKER HAVEN

USPTO serial 86577907

WHISKER HAVEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FIORELLI, JOANNA ELISA-HOLGUI
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WHISKER HAVEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven Plotkin

STEVEN PLOTKIN Walt Disney500 S Buena Vista StBurbank, CA 91521-0007UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Production, presentation, distribution, and rental of motion picture films; production, presentation, distribution and rental of radio programs; production and rental of sound and visual recordings; production of animated entertainment shows and interactive programs for distribution via audio and visual media, and electronic means; production of entertainment news and entertainment information via communication and computer networks; providing entertainment services via a global communication network in the nature of online games and websites featuring a wide variety of general interest entertainment information relating to motion picture films, musical videos; amusement park and theme park services; educational and entertainment services rendered in or relating to theme parks, namely, live stage shows, live amusement park shows, live performances by costumed characters, and presentation of live theatrical performances; presentation of live stage shows; presentation of live show performances; theater productions; entertainer services, namely, live appearances by a professional entertainer; entertainment services, namely, providing an on-going web series featuring animated children's programing provided through webcasts via a computer software applicationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 24, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 24, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 8, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 7, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 17, 2016EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 17, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 30, 2016NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Sep 29, 2016DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 29, 2016CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Sep 22, 2016INOAAMENDMENT AFTER NOA NOT ENTERED—
Sep 22, 2016EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 8, 2016DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Aug 8, 2016ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 22, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 21, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 15, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 15, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 22, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 27, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 27, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 7, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 17, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 22, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 18, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 17, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 17, 2015ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 6, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 6, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 15, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 14, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 14, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 18, 2015GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 18, 2015GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 18, 2015CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 18, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 6, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 30, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance