USPTO serial 86579232
SILKA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5993373Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 25, 2020
- Examiner
- HAYES, GINA CLARK
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SILKA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mont-Royal, Quebec, CA
Mont-Royal, Quebec, CA
Mont-Royal, Quebec, CA
MONTREAL, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gregory J. Chinlund
Gregory J. Chinlund Marshall Gerstein Borun233 S Wacker Dr Ste 6300Chicago, IL 60606-6471UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Bathroom tissue, paper towels, paper hand towels, paper napkins, facial tissue, disposable wipes not impregnated with chemicals or compounds | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by 2545-2509 QUEBEC INC.
- Other trademarks owned by 2545-2509 QUEBEC INC.
- Other trademarks owned by 2545-2509 QUEBEC INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CASCADES CANADA ULC
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named SILKA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 2026 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 25, 2025 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2022 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 13, 2022 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 22, 2020 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 25, 2020 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 10, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 20, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 6, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 23, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 10, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 3, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 18, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 15, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 5, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 17, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 15, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 15, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 27, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 26, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 26, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 30, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 2, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |