USPTO serial 86579909
AVANTECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KUYKENDALL, LYNDSEY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AVANTECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer services, namely, integration of computer software into multiple systems and networks; Computer services, namely, on-site management of information technology (IT) systems; Computer services, namely, remote and on-site management of technology systems of others; Computer services, namely, remote management of the information technology (IT) systems of others; Computer services, namely, remote management of technology systems for others; Computer system design services; Computer systems analysis; Computer systems integration services; Computer technical support services, namely, 24/7 service desk or help desk services for IT infrastructure, operating systems, database systems, and web applications; Consulting services in the design and implementation of computer-based information systems for businesses; Consulting services in the field of computer-based information systems for businesses; Consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; Consulting services in the fields of selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; Custom design and engineering of telephony systems, cable television systems and fiber optics; Design and development of automated controller systems, namely, temperature, humidity and electrical controllers; Design and development of automated home controller systems, namely, temperature, humidity, and electrical controllers; Design and development of electronic data security systems; Design and development of home security systems; Design and development of integrated data collection and wireless transmission hardware systems for equipment and for software applications associated with that equipment at mining, construction, and industrial sites; Design and development of on-line computer software systems; Design and development of wireless communication systems for transmission and reception of voice, data and video; Design and inspection of fire alarm, detection and suppression systems; Design of traffic systems; Franchising services, namely, planning and design of information technology systems for business franchises; Integration of computer systems and networks; Planning of buildings and infrastructure systems for buildings; Planning, design and management of information technology systems | ACTIVE | Nov 1, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 2, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 7, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |