Drawing for THINK INSURANCE

USPTO serial 86581342

THINK INSURANCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ULRICH, NANCY G
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THINK INSURANCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel A. Rosenberg

DANIEL A ROSENBERG BRIGGS & MORGAN2200 IDS CENTER80 S 8TH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Banking; Banking and financial services in the nature of an investment security; Insurance services, namely, issuance of auto, home, renters, umbrella, personal article insurance; Investments consulting and investment advisory services; Financial planning; Financial planning for retirement; Savings account services for use in funding higher education costs; Insurance brokerage; Trust management accounts; Mortgage services, namely, buyer pre-qualification of mortgages for mortgage brokers and bankACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 10, 2017MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 7, 2017ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 7, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 7, 2017EXDMEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT—
Nov 10, 2016GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 10, 2016GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 10, 2016CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Sep 19, 2016JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 21, 2016EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 21, 2016EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 29, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 29, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 29, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 12, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 11, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 11, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 13, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 13, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 13, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 6, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 8, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance