Drawing for DOC.ROYAL

USPTO serial 86581923

DOC.ROYAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PERRY, KIMBERLY B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DOC.ROYAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kao H. Lu

Kao. H Lu/Chun-Ming ShihP.O. BOX 230970Centreville, VA 20120UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Artificial teeth; Dental apparatus, namely, intra-oral light systems; Dental burrs; Dental chairs; Dental examination chairs; Dental handpieces; Dental instruments, namely, oral irrigators; Dental intra-oral cameras; Dental operating lamps; Dental picks; Dentists' chairs; Dentures; Intra-oral dental light system; Mirrors for dentists; Orthodontic appliances; Pulse meters; Sphygmomanometers; StentsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 13, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 13, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 16, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 16, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 13, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 18, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 18, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 13, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 10, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 8, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 10, 2015MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Apr 9, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 3, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance