USPTO serial 86582074
HIFI LIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5168574Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 21, 2017
- Examiner
- YOUNG, THOMAS PAUL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HIFI LIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richar d A. Sharpe
MILES-BRAMWELL EXECUTIVE SERVICES LIMITEDCLOVER NOOK ROADSOMERCOTES, ALFRETONDERBYSHIRE, DE554RFGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Food and food products, namely, snacks, meals and entrées consisting primarily of pasta, rice, processed cereals, processed grains, processed maize meal, processed wheat, potato flour, corn flour, bread, rusks, food seasonings, processed herbs, spices; prepared and packaged meals, namely, prepared pasta meals, noodle-based prepared meals, meals consisting primarily of pasta, meals consisting primarily of rice, pasta dishes, rice dishes, prepared rice, prepared pasta, prepared meat pies, prepared baking mixes for making batters; cereal-based prepared snack foods, rice-based prepared snack foods, grain-based prepared snack foods; snack foods made predominantly from cereals, processed grains, rice, processed wheat, maize meal, potato flour, corn flour, pasta, chocolate, rusks; rice based snack food, crispbread-based snack food, tortilla-based snack food, sesame snacks in the nature of sesame sticks, cereal-based snack foods, puffed corn snacks; snacks in the nature of rice cakes; maize-based snack food, cereal-based snack foods in the nature of cereal bars, corn-based snack food, potato-based snack food, pasta-based snack food, rice-based snack food, cereal-based snack food, wheat-based snack foods, snack foods made from corn, snack foods made primarily from cereal, snack foods consisting principally of bread; ready-to-eat cereals prepared for human consumption; frozen dough for use as pizza, bread or other bread type products; frozen confectionery; frozen prepared rice; frozen pasta; carbohydrate preparations of food, namely, potato flour, cereal flour, corn flour, rice flour; potato-based products, namely, potato flour; flour; chocolate-based snack bars; cocoa-based snack bars; rice-based snack bars; prepared and packaged meals, namely, chilled and frozen meals consisting primarily of one or more of pasta, rice, processed grains, processed maize meal, processed wheat, processed corn, bread, rusks, processed oats and cereals; meat sauces, namely, barbeque sauces; mayonnaise for food; starch syrup for food; spices; meat products in the nature of meat pies, sausages, burger patties, meat pasties, meat pastries, sausage rolls, pork pies; preparations made from cereals, namely, cereal bars; bread; snack foods, namely, cereal-based snack foods, grain-based snack foods; prepared and packaged meals, namely, prepared meals consisting primarily of pasta, rice, processed grains, processed cereals; vinegar; non-alcoholic drinks, namely, tea-based beverages; coffee-based beverages; none of the aforesaid consisting primarily of fruit or vegetables | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2023 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 21, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2017 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jul 18, 2017 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 18, 2017 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 24, 2017 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 21, 2017 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 14, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 8, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 3, 2017 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 2, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 18, 2017 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2017 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 9, 2017 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2016 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2016 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2016 | EPEN | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY | — |
| Aug 1, 2016 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 15, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 15, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 1, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 10, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |