Drawing for PEOPLEFOCUS

USPTO serial 86582083

PEOPLEFOCUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SWIFT, GILBERT M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PEOPLEFOCUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Carrie L. Kiedrowski

Carrie L. Kiedrowski Jones Day250 Vesey StreetNew York, NY 10281-1047UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035MARKETING CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF BUSINESS; PAYROLL ADMINISTRATION, MANAGEMENT, PREPARATION AND PROCESSING SERVICES; COMPUTERIZED PAYROLL SERVICES, NAMELY, PAYROLL PROCESSING SERVICES; ONLINE BUSINESS SERVICES, NAMELY, PAYROLL PREPARATION SERVICES; EMPLOYEE ADMINISTRATION SERVICES, NAMELY, EMPLOYEE'S TIME AND ATTENDANCE RECORDING AND REPORTING; TAX FILING SERVICES; RECORD KEEPING FOR EMPLOYEE BENEFITS PLANS, WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION, THIRD PARTY GARNISHMENT PROCESSING, AND UNEMPLOYMENT CLAIMS ADMINISTRATIONACTIVE—
036PROVIDING AN ON-LINE COMPUTER DATABASE TO INSURANCE BROKERS, EMPLOYERS AND EMPLOYEES IN THE FIELD OF PROGRAMS, BENEFITS, PRODUCTS AND SERVICES OF VARIOUS FULL SERVICE INSURANCE GENERAL AGENCIES; INSURANCE BROKERAGE SERVICES; ADMINISTRATION OF BUSINESS EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS CONCERNING INSURANCE; FINANCIAL SERVICES, NAMELY, ADMINISTRATION OF EMPLOYEE BENEFITS PLANS CONCERNING FINANCE AND INSURANCE; PAYROLL TAX DEBITING SERVICES; FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATION OF EMPLOYEE PENSION PLANS VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKACTIVE—
045REGULATORY COMPLIANCE CONSULTING IN THE FIELD OF COMPLIANCE WITH LEGISLATION AND REGULATIONS IN THE FIELD OF INSURANCEACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 9, 2022ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 27, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 24, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 20, 2020EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 20, 2020EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 20, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 20, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 19, 2020EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 10, 2020AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 2, 2020NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2020TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Oct 2, 2020PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 2, 2020PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 28, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 27, 2020EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 29, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 27, 2020EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 27, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 27, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 16, 2019ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 2, 2019CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 2, 2019COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 2, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 2, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 12, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 30, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 30, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 10, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 10, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 24, 2018ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 26, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 6, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 26, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 26, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 26, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 28, 2017RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 20, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 14, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 14, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 14, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 23, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 22, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 22, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 20, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 16, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 15, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 15, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 15, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 15, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 15, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 7, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 10, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Apr 9, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 3, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance