USPTO serial 86582942
FRUBET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COGAN, BRITTNEY LORRAINE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FRUBET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New York, NY
Woodcliff Lake, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Justin B. Bender
Justin B. Bender Justin B Bender Esq445 Park Ave Fl 9New York, NY 10022-8606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Chilled, cold, creamed, frozen, iced, soft-served and whipped food items consisting essentially of fruit namely, Frozen dessert consisting of fruit and Fruit ice; Chilled, cold, creamed, frozen, iced, soft-served and whipped confections, desserts and novelties, namely, Ice milk made of coconut milk; Ice milk bars made of coconut milk; Ice cream; Custard; Frozen custard; Edible ices; Edible fruit ices; Frozen yogurt; Fruit ice bar; Gelato; Italian ice; Chocolate mousse; Dessert mousse; Dessert pudding; Shaved ice confections; Sherbet; Sorbet; Spumoni; Bakery goods; Candy bar; Frozen juice bars; Beverages made of tea; Cocoa-based beverages; Brownies; Cakes; Cupcakes; Candies; Cannoli; Cocoa; Artificial coffee; Coffee; Cones for ice cream; Waffle cones; Cookies; Crepes; Espresso drinks; Flavorings for foods; Ice cream floats; Pecan logs; Lollipops; Parfaits; Pastries; Toaster pastries; Pies; Frozen confections, namely, freezer pops; Cream puffs; Ice cream sandwiches; Sandwiches; Sesame sticks; Honey substitutes; Sugar cones for ice cream; Ice cream sundaes; Corn syrup; Barley tea; Iced tea; Tea; Chocolate topping; Topping syrup | ACTIVE | Jul 15, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 1, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 20, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 20, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 20, 2020 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 13, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 12, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2019 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2019 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 1, 2019 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2019 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 8, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2019 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2019 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 3, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2018 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 1, 2018 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 3, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2018 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 1, 2018 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 1, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 3, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2017 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 1, 2017 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 31, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 25, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 3, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2017 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 3, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 3, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 6, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 17, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 27, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 7, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 7, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |