Drawing for ASPECT EQ

USPTO serial 86584270

ASPECT EQ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
NEWKIRK, MERIDITH E.
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ASPECT EQ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel J. Bourque

DANIEL J. BOURQUE Bourque & Associates Pa835 Hanover St Ste 301Manchester, NH 03104-5401UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for use in connection with customer contact centers and back office operations, namely, computer software providing workforce management, contact interaction quality monitoring, call recording, screen recording, contact surveys, eLearning, performance management, speech analytics, coaching, data encryption, desktop analytics and PCI complianceACTIVEJan 21, 2015

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 5, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 5, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 5, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2016CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Nov 17, 2016SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Nov 17, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Nov 13, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Oct 27, 2016IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Oct 27, 2016EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Oct 27, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 27, 2016EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Apr 9, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Apr 7, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Apr 7, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Apr 7, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 27, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 1, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Sep 1, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 12, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jul 30, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 27, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 14, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 14, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jul 14, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jul 14, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jul 14, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jul 8, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 29, 2015TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
Apr 29, 2015PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED
Apr 27, 2015TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
Apr 27, 2015PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED
Apr 10, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Apr 4, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance