Drawing for THE DROP

USPTO serial 86584302

THE DROP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARK, ROBERT C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE DROP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey H. Epstein

Jeffrey H. Epstein Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, P.C.114 West 47th StreetNew York, NY 10036-1525UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Providing a website featuring the ratings, reviews, producer profiles, and bottle recommendations posted by consumers on restaurants, food and wine for commercial purposes; Retail store services and online retail store services, both featuring wine, merchandise, and gift items; providing a website featuring product ratings and reviews in the field of wine for commercial purposes; providing advertising service to distribute advertisements for display on Internet, namely, in websites, social conversations over the Internet, emails, microblogs, blogs, electronic messages, instant messages, text messages, multimedia messages, social networks, status updates, forums, electronic bulletin boards; organization of business conventions; business marketing services; Organization of business conventions in the field of wineACTIVE—
040Providing online information in the field of wine making and food processingACTIVE—
041Online electronic publishing of books and periodicals in the fields of wine and food, cocktail recipes, pairing tips and bottle recommendations, spirts recommendations, restaurant trends and recommendations, entertaining guides and tips, all exclusively for non-business and non-commercial transactions and purposes; On-line journals, namely, blogs featuring information about wine and food; organizing seminars in the field of wine and viniculture; organizing awards of excellence in the field of wine; Providing recognition and incentives by the way of awards to demonstrate excellence in the field of wine; on-line electronic newsletters delivered by email in the field of wineACTIVE—
043Providing a web site featuring the ratings, reviews and recommendations on wines for wine appreciation purposes posted by viewers; sommelier services, namely, providing advice on wine and wine and food pairing; providing online information in the fields of wine characteristics and food preparation; Providing information in the nature of recipes for alcoholic and non-alcoholic drinks; providing reviews of restaurants; Providing personalized information about hotels and temporary accommodations for travel via the Internet; Providing information, news and commentary in the field of diningACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 26, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 26, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 17, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 17, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2016CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 12, 2016COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 26, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 26, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 26, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 25, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 30, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 30, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 10, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 22, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 18, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 23, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 22, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 22, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 22, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 21, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 21, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 21, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 21, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 10, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 4, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance