Drawing for MY GOODNESS

USPTO serial 86585117

MY GOODNESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHARLON, BARNEY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MY GOODNESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer C. Debrow

JENNIFER C. DEBROW GRAY, PLANT, MOOTY, MOOTY & BENNETT, P.A.500 IDS Center, 80 South Eighth StreetMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Frozen, prepared or packaged side dishes consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; frozen, prepared or packaged prepared entrees consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetablesACTIVE—
030Sauces; frozen, prepared or packaged prepared side dishes consisting primarily of pasta or rice, frozen, prepared or packaged entrees consisting primarily of pasta or rice; cooking sauces; cheese sauce; pizza sauce; pasta sauceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 28, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 28, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 23, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 9, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 2016NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2016DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 8, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 2, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 10, 2015DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 10, 2015ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 27, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 1, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 1, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 12, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 27, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 27, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 15, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 12, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 12, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 12, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 19, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 19, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 19, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 5, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 5, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 5, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 28, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 14, 2015MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Apr 11, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 6, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance