USPTO serial 86585378
DO - ITT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPARACINO, MARK V
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DO - ITT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Stuttgart, DE
Stuttgart, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Diane M. Lambillotte
DIANE M. LAMBILLOTTE Arent Fox Llp555 W 5th St Fl 48Los Angeles, CA 90013-1065UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Data processing equipment; Computers; Computer software for business steering, project management and market analysis | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business management; Business administration; Office functions; Business assistance; Business consultancy and advisory services; Business inquiries; Accountancy; Business consulting services, namely, business analysis, research and information services, especially evaluation of conformity, evaluation of companies, business analyses; Collating, compiling, systemization and maintenance, also via Internet, of test data and other data, in particular certification and company data in data bases; Evaluation of business opportunities with regards to professional business matters, professional business consultancy; Business organization consultancy; Data processing services | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational testing services, namely, undertaking technical repeating examinations for the documentation of the achieved standards | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Industrial analysis and research services in the field of automotive and insurance; Design and development of computer hardware and software engineering testing; Conducting inspections of sales and after-sales process, quality standards, brand representation standards for quality control purposes; Development of voluntary safety and quality standards for automotive distribution to develop sales, optimize profitability and achieve customer satisfaction; Testing, analysis and evaluation of automotive dealers and workshops for the purpose of certification; Quality control for others; IT-Services, namely, IT consultancy and advisory and information services; Computer services, namely, data recovery services; Research with regard to the development and implementation of computer and computer systems; Computer project management services; Updating of websites for others; Monitoring services of computer systems via remote access to ensure proper functioning; Engineering services, Engineering services in the field of vehicles, automotive sector, quality management, retailer organization, sales processes and supply chain management; Design of computer software; Technical surveying; Product testing and product safety testing; Workplace certification services, namely, conducting surveys and testing for workplace excellence; Consultancy with regard to quality control and quality assurance services in the field of automotive and insurance; Consultancy services regarding product and material testing; Scientific research services, namely, conducting scientific experiments and conducting scientific tests; Quality management services, namely, quality evaluation and analysis, quality assurance and quality control, in the field of automotive and insurance; Product safety testing services and consulting; Testing, analysis and evaluation of automotive and insurance business processes and standards for the purpose of certification, namely, awarding of test seals, quality seals, quality marks, test marks, test plates, seals of quality and certificates and benchmarks in the context of technical tests; Material testing; Scientific research services, namely, scientific research in databases and on the internet | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Analysis and consulting pertaining to job site safety; safety consulting services in the field of hazard assessments and abatement procedures; Investigation services related to insurance claims | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DEKRA e.V.
- Other trademarks owned by DEKRA e.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named DO - ITT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 22, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 18, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 23, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 3, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 12, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 12, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 15, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 15, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 5, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 16, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2015 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 29, 2015 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2015 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |