Drawing for IFME

USPTO serial 86585713

IFME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IFME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marsha G. Gentner

MARSHA G. GENTNER Dykema Gossett Pllc1301 K STREET, NW, SUITE 1100 WESTWashington, DC 20005UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025CLOTHING, NAMELY, CHILDREN'S UNDERWEAR, CHILDREN'S BOTTOMS, CHILDREN'S PANTS, CHILDREN'S SKIRTS, CHILDREN'S SHIRTS, CHILDREN'S SWEATERS, CHILDREN'S COATS, CHILDREN'S PONCHOS, CHILDREN'S SWIMSUITS, CHILDREN'S PAJAMAS, CHILDREN'S SPORTS JERSEYS; SOCKS; STOCKINGS; GLOVES AND MITTENS; HEADWEAR; RAINCOATS; RAIN BOOTS; LEATHER SHOES; BOOTS; WINTER BOOTS; SPECIAL FOOTWEAR FOR SPORTS; INFANTS' BOOTS; CHILDREN'S BOOTS; SHOE INSOLESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 24, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 24, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 24, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 22, 2018EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 22, 2018EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 22, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 25, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2017EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 23, 2017EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 23, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 24, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 21, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 21, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 4, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 4, 2016NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Oct 3, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 3, 2016DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 16, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 15, 2016INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
Sep 11, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 22, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 22, 2016DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2016ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 8, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2016CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 6, 2016COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 29, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 29, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 9, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 23, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 17, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 17, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 17, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 10, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 9, 2015GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 9, 2015GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 9, 2015CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 9, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 5, 2015AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jun 1, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 27, 2015PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Apr 13, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 6, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance