Drawing for MALAI

USPTO serial 86586833

MALAI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CROWDER-SCHAEFER, ANDREW W
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MALAI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey J. Schwartz

JEFFREY J SCHWARTZ SCHWARTZ LAW FIRM PC6100 FAIRVIEW RD STE 1135CHARLOTTE, NC 28210-4258UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Ice cream, gelato, dairy-free ice cream, frozen yogurt, frozen desserts, ice cream sandwiches, sorbet, freezer pops, and ice cream sundaesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 31, 2019MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 30, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 21, 2019ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 21, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 6, 2019EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Sep 25, 2018RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Aug 24, 2018GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 24, 2018GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 24, 2018CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jun 25, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 16, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 16, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 4, 2018RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
May 4, 2018RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
May 4, 2018RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Apr 27, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 26, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 26, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2017GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Dec 18, 2017GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Dec 18, 2017CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Nov 14, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 13, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 13, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 4, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 4, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 4, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 2017MREINOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED—
Aug 8, 2017RGRRREINSTATEMENT GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Aug 8, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 8, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 8, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 7, 2016AAUANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED—
Sep 6, 2016IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Aug 19, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 19, 2016AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 19, 2016IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Aug 18, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 18, 2016ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 18, 2016EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Feb 18, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 18, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 18, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 21, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 20, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 20, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 20, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 20, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 20, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 13, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 13, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 7, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance