Drawing for LIFTBIT

USPTO serial 86587605

LIFTBIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TOY, JOSHUA SPENCER JOLL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LIFTBIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen J. Strauss

STEPHEN J. STRAUSS BUCHALTER NEMER, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION1000 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 1500Los Angeles, CA 90017-2457UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Educational and entertainment services, namely, the presentation of seminars, lectures, workshops and panel discussions, and ongoing television and radio talk shows in the fields of politics, health, social issues, history, time management, professional development, economics, culture, leadership and inspiration, and current affairs; Providing a website featuring motivational and inspirational quotes from, and interviews with, celebrities, authors, politicians and other noteworthy persons, and related videos, film clips, photographs, and other multimedia materials featuring entertainmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 30, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 29, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 26, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 24, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 24, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 24, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 24, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 1, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 1, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 10, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 21, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 21, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 21, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 21, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 21, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 15, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 14, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 14, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 17, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 17, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 17, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 13, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 15, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Apr 14, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 8, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance