Drawing for IRENE ROTH

USPTO serial 86588703

IRENE ROTH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FATHY, DOMINIC
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IRENE ROTH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Apolzon

LAWRENCE E. APOLZON Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu P C4 TIMES SQUARE, 17TH FLOORNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, women's suits, pantsuits, tops, bottoms, dresses, coats, blouses, jackets, skirts, sweaters, bustiers, vests, T-shirts, shirts, and knitwear, namely, sweaters, cardigans, and tops; clothing accessories, namely, belts, women's neckties, women's bowties, pocket squares; footwear; headwearACTIVE—
035Online retail store services featuring clothing, clothing accessories, footwear, headwear, bags, handbags, small leather accessories, wallets, leather fashion articlesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 26, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 26, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 5, 2017CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED—
Jan 31, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 22, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 11, 2016ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Apr 28, 2016ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 29, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 9, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 19, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 19, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 18, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 18, 2016ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 8, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 8, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 19, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 18, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 18, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 13, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 13, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 13, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 13, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 15, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 9, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance