USPTO serial 86588886
DEEP INTELLIGENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEVERLY, JOSETTE MICHELLE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DEEP INTELLIGENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew L. Reibman
ANDREW L. REIBMAN K&l Gates Llp599 Lexington AveNew York, NY 10022-6030UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software for the autonomous control and monitoring of motor vehicles; application software for optical remote sensors for obstacle detection, mapping, navigation of autonomous vehicles; machine learning software for use in programming autonomous vehicles; software for data analysis and machine learning capabilities, namely, for use in software to integrate manufacturing machine operations, track problems and generate production reports; computer application software for security and safety applications, namely, software for video analytics for the analysis of performance of manufacturing machine operations and performance of robotics operations; computer software to automate transportation operations; computer software for providing an on-line database in the field of transaction processing to upload transactional data, provide statistical analysis, and produce notifications and reports for the analysis of performance of manufacturing machine operations and performance of robotics operations; advanced product research in the field of intelligent cars, autonomous driving; computer hardware and software for 3-D range sensing, namely, for object dimensioning, object classification, object tracking, and motion control, namely, autonomous navigation; computerized operating equipment and devices for guidance, navigation, and control, namely, car navigation system, comprising navigation systems, head-up display and car dashboard panel; software for intelligent vehicle traffic system for use in software to manage traffic; application software for the steering and control of vehicles for use in the fields of car accident prediction, emergency driving support, car defect detection, car failure prediction, car telematics, pay-as-you-drive insurance; computer software and hardware for roadside computers to help cars collaborate using vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) communication; machine learning software used in manufacturing applications for use in monitoring and controlling communication between computers and automated machine systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services, featuring computer software for intelligent video analytics for the analysis of performance of manufacturing machine operations and performance of robotics operations, software for the autonomous control and monitoring of motor vehicles, machine learning software for use in programming autonomous vehicles, software for data analysis and machine learning capabilities, namely, for use in software to integrate manufacturing machine operations, track problems and generate production reports, computer application software for security and safety applications, namely, software for video analytics for the analysis performance of manufacturing machine operations and performance of robotics operations; computer software to automate transportation operations and computer software for providing an on-line database in the field of transaction processing to upload transactional data, provide statistical analysis, and produce notifications and reports for the analysis of performance of manufacturing machine operations and performance of robotics operations; advanced product research in the field of intelligent cars and autonomous driving; computer software consulting and computer software development for others in the fields of signal processing, electronic forensics, video processing, video content analysis, vehicle tracking, artificial intelligence, computer based simulations, remote navigation and autonomous navigation systems; computer software consulting and computer software development for others in the fields of connected cars and car-to-car communication; car defect detection safety analysis services, namely, conducting crash tests and providing advice, information and reports; providing data analysis services in the field of genomic, vital signs, environmental and infectious disease information for scientific research purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Providing data analysis services in the field of genomic, vital signs, environmental and infectious disease information for disease detection and treatment purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Monitoring of security systems, namely, video surveillance and video analytics for security purposes; car telematic services in the nature of providing information concerning safety risks on driver behavior to consumers and automobile insurance companies | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Preferred Networks America
- Other trademarks owned by Preferred Networks America
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named DEEP INTELLIGENCE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 6, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 3, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2018 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2018 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 5, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 3, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 8, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 19, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 25, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 4, 2017 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 2, 2017 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 19, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 18, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 7, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 18, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 23, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 15, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |