USPTO serial 86590244
VIFIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 19, 2018
- Examiner
- COLLOPY, DIANE PATRICIA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with VIFIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
3818 LE Amersfoort, NL
FRIESLANDCAMPINA NEDERLAND B.V.
AMERSFOORT, NL
FRIESLANDCAMPINA NEDERLAND B.V.
AMERSFOORT, NL
FRIESLANDCAMPINA NEDERLAND B.V.
AMERSFOORT, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roberto Ledesma
ROBERTO LEDESMA Law Office Of Roberto LedesmaPO Box 230692New York, NY 10023-0012UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Proteins in the nature of casein and whey proteins for human consumption, namely, for use as a dietary supplement in the nature of a food additive | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 029 | Milk and dairy products, namely, milk, milk powder, dehydrated milk, evaporated milk, dairy-based food beverages, butter, butter ghee, cream, milk curd; edible oils and fats, namely, concentrated butter and edible anhydrous milk fats, edible fats in the nature of a mixture primarily consisting of vegetables and butyric fatty acids, edible oils and fats, yoghurt, natural yoghurt, drinkable yoghurt, cheese; cottage cheese; sour cream; dehydrated milk; whipped toppings; coffee cream, namely, cream for coffee; and coffee whitener consisting of vegetable-based edible fat; evaporated milk; dairy based beverages flavored with cocoa, chocolate, coffee, or other flavorings, namely, vanilla, fruit juices, fruit flavorings, fruit flavors, mocha, caramel, green tea, mint or honey; fermented milk products, namely, buttermilk, yoghurt drinks, sour milk drinks, fruit yoghurt, dietetic yoghurt for non-medical purposes, namely, low-fat yoghurt, non-fat yoghurt, low-sugar yoghurt and sugar-free yoghurt; dairy-based meat substitutes; milk curd; chocolate beverages containing milk, namely, chocolate milk | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Custards in the nature of blancmange; dessert mousses; puddings | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Friesland Brands B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by FRIESLANDCAMPINA NEDERLAND B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by FRIESLANDCAMPINA NEDERLAND B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by FRIESLANDCAMPINA NEDERLAND B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named VIFIT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2025 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 19, 2023 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 3, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 14, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2018 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 16, 2018 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jan 23, 2018 | OTHE | CASE RETURNED TO EXAMINATION | — |
| Jan 23, 2018 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2018 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 3, 2018 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jan 1, 2018 | TPAD | TEAS PETITION TO AMEND BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 3, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 8, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 19, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 19, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 21, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 24, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 27, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 31, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 15, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |