USPTO serial 86590394
NEXTLINK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AIKENS, RONALD E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NEXTLINK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Weatherford, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bobby W Braxton
BOBBY W BRAXTON BRAXTON HILTON & PERRONE PLLC4975 PRESTON PARK BLVDSUITE 490PLANO, TX 75093-3678Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Internet service provider (ISP) | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2017 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 21, 2017 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 21, 2017 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 19, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 19, 2017 | EXDM | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT | — |
| Mar 28, 2017 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2017 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2017 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | PGTT | PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2016 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 8, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 8, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 8, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 11, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 11, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 23, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 22, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 17, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |