USPTO serial 86592511
ANALYSERX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ANALYSERX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
South San Francisco, CA
South San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maureen Sheehan
MAUREEN SHEEHAN Hearst Corporation300 W 57th St Fl 42New York, NY 10019-3790UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | PROVIDING AN ONLINE COMPUTER DATABASE FEATURING BUSINESS INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF DRUG INFORMATION RELATING TO COST EFFECTIVENESS OF PHARMACEUTICALS IN ORDER TO ASSIST AND IMPROVE MEDICATION-RELATED DECISIONS TO ENHANCE CLINICAL CARE | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | PROVIDING AN ONLINE COMPUTER DATABASE FEATURING MEDICAL INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF DRUG INFORMATION RELATING TO BEST PRESCRIBING PRACTICES IN ORDER TO ASSIST AND IMPROVE MEDICATION-RELATED DECISIONS TO ENHANCE CLINICAL CARE | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | PROVIDING AN ONLINE COMPUTER DATABASE FEATURING PRODUCT SAFETY INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF DRUG INFORMATION RELATING TO SAFETY COMPLIANCE IN ORDER TO ASSIST AND IMPROVE MEDICATION-RELATED DECISIONS TO ENHANCE CLINICAL CARE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by First Databank, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by First Databank, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named ANALYSERX
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 20, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 12, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2019 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 12, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2018 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 11, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 19, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 19, 2018 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2018 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2018 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 3, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2017 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2017 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 14, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2017 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2017 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 17, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 19, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 23, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 3, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 9, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 20, 2015 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 20, 2015 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 20, 2015 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 16, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |