USPTO serial 86597174
DARK HORSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCDORMAN, ROGER THOMAS
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DARK HORSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New Kensington, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey T. Morris
JEFFREY T. MORRIS Elliott & Davis P C425 1st AvePittsburgh, PA 15219-1321UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Bells for motorcycles; Brake discs for motorcycles; Electric motorcycles; Motorcycle accessories, namely, front and side plates; Motorcycle and automobile structural parts, namely, sumpguards; Motorcycle bags, namely, tank bags, saddle bags, sissy bar bags and tail bags; Motorcycle drive chains; Motorcycle engines; Motorcycle foot pegs; Motorcycle grip tape; Motorcycle kickstands; Motorcycle parts, namely, brackets for mounting motorcycle saddlebags to motorcycles; Motorcycle parts, namely, chromed safety pads; Motorcycle parts, namely, heel guards; Motorcycle saddlebags; Motorcycle sprockets; Motorcycle swing arms; Motorcycles; Motorcycles and structural parts therefor; Motorcycles for motocross; Pannier bags for motorcycles; Parts of motorcycles, namely, brake cables; Parts of motorcycles, namely, brake calipers; Parts of motorcycles, namely, brake levers; Parts of motorcycles, namely, brake master cylinder assemblies; Parts of motorcycles, namely, brake pedals; Parts of motorcycles, namely, brake rotors; Parts of motorcycles, namely, clutch cables; Parts of motorcycles, namely, clutch master cylinder assemblies; Parts of motorcycles, namely, fork bearings and races; Parts of motorcycles, namely, fork dust boots; Parts of motorcycles, namely, fork seals; Parts of motorcycles, namely, front dash panels; Parts of motorcycles, namely, front spacers; Parts of motorcycles, namely, handle bar control levers; Parts of motorcycles, namely, handle bar dampers; Parts of motorcycles, namely, handle bar grips; Parts of motorcycles, namely, handle bar throttles; Parts of motorcycles, namely, handle bars; Parts of motorcycles, namely, headlight mounts; Parts of motorcycles, namely, master cylinders; Parts of motorcycles, namely, shift levers; Shock absorbers for motorcycles; Sissy bars for motorcycles; Structural parts for motorcycles | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 2000 |
| 025 | Boots for motorcycling; Motorcycle gloves; Motorcycle jackets | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 2000 |
| 040 | Custom building of motorcycles | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2018 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Dec 20, 2018 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2018 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 4, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 14, 2017 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 19, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 30, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 12, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 12, 2016 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 12, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 17, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 22, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |