Drawing for R

USPTO serial 86598379

R

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with R?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard M. Gitten

HOWARD M. GITTEN Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP550 W. Adams Street, Suite 300Chicago, IL 60661UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Handbags, purses and walletsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 22, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 21, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 22, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 20, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 20, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 20, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 20, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 20, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 20, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 20, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 7, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 6, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 1, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Sep 1, 2017TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Sep 1, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 1, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2017NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Jul 10, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 10, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 10, 2017DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 10, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 20, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 20, 2017DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2017ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 25, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 25, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 5, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 17, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 8, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 8, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 8, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 8, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 8, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 22, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 22, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 17, 2016ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 17, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 17, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 11, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 11, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 8, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 3, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 19, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 3, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 23, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 23, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Apr 22, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 18, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance