Drawing for TUNDRA TESTED

USPTO serial 86599664

TUNDRA TESTED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VOHRA, SANJEEV KUMAR
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TUNDRA TESTED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew S. Ehard

ANDREW S. EHARD Merchant & Gould P CPO Box 2910Minneapolis, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Lights for vehiclesACTIVE—
012brackets and racks for mounting luggage, carrying cases, tools, guns, and fuel containers to vehicles; trailer hitches; receiver hitches; storage containers, cargo carriers, and carrying racks for vehicles; fenders for all-terrain vehicles; windshields for all-terrain vehicles; fitted covers for vehicles; fitted vehicle seat coversACTIVE—
013gun casesACTIVE—
018hand luggage and luggage for attachment to vehiclesACTIVE—
020non-metal containers for liquid fuelACTIVE—
028archery bow casesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 3, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 2, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 31, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 27, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 27, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 27, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 1, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 6, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 6, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 16, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 31, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 31, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 12, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 10, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 10, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 10, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 25, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 23, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 20, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance