Drawing for PLUMB4ORCE

USPTO serial 86600193

PLUMB4ORCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POLLACK, ALISON FRIEDBERG
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PLUMB4ORCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Amy Cohen Heller

AMY COHEN HELLER Schiff Hardin LlpPO Box 6079Chicago, IL 60606-0079UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011ToiletsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 11, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 11, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 14, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 10, 2017EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 10, 2017EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 10, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 11, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 9, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 9, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 9, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 8, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 8, 2016NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Dec 7, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 7, 2016DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 3, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 10, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 10, 2016DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Nov 10, 2016ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Nov 10, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 10, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 15, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 15, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 24, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 1, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 30, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 29, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 29, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 29, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 25, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Apr 24, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 20, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance