USPTO serial 86601339
ARIAGA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 16, 2016
- Examiner
- SINGH, TEJBIR
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with ARIAGA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $850
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Viroflay, FR
Viroflay, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kristin H. Altoff
Kristin H. Altoff Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, NWAttn: TMSUWashington, DC 20004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Chocolate and chocolate products, namely, chocolate bars, chocolate candy, [pralines,] chocolate bonbons, [stuffed chocolate pieces, chocolate lollipops, candy;] chocolate confectionery; couverture chocolate | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2022 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2022 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 30, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 21, 2022 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2021 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2016 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 9, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 20, 2016 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 20, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 6, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 27, 2016 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2016 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2016 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2016 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 18, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 18, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 18, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 15, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 27, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |