USPTO serial 86603543
HUCK CANCER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HUCK CANCER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Organizing and conducting flying disc tournaments to raise awareness for cancer | ABANDONED | Mar 20, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2017 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 3, 2017 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 3, 2017 | CU.T | CONCURRENT USE TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 3, 2017 | CU.M | CONCURRENT USE DISSOLVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2016 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 22, 2016 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 22, 2016 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 25, 2015 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 25, 2015 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 27, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 7, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 23, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 27, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 27, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 30, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |