USPTO serial 86606033
ANTEIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KOZAK, EVIN L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ANTEIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Plan-les-Ouates, CH
Plan-les-Ouates, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey H. Epstein
JEFFREY H. EPSTEIN COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN, P.C.114 West 47th StreetNew York, NY 10036-6710UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Articles for body and beauty care, namely, anti-aging creams, beauty gels, body and beauty care cosmetics, cosmetic creams for skin care | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, INJECTABLE BIOPOLYMERS AND BIOPOLYMER GELS IN THE FIELD OF COSMETOLOGY, AESTHETIC DERMATOLOGY, COSMETIC SURGERY, OPHTHALMOLOGY AND RHEUMATOLOGY, NAMELY, INJECTABLE DERMAL FILLERS FOR MEDICAL PURPOSES; OCULAR IMPLANTS COMPRISING LIVING TISSUE; INJECTION PENS IN THE NATURE OF INJECTION NEEDLES SOLD FILLED WITH PHARMACEUTICALS IN THE NATURE OF BIOPOLYMERS AND HYALURONIC ACID; INGESTIBLE IMPLANTS CONSISTING OF HYALURONIC ACID BASED GEL IMPLANTS COMPRISING LIVING TISSUE FOR INJECTION, SOLD IN A PRE-FILLED SYRINGE, WITH OR WITHOUT A SPECIALLY DESIGNED INJECTION TOOL | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | SURGICAL APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY, IMPLANTS CONSISTING OF ARTIFICIAL MATERIALS, SURGICAL IMPLANTS CONSISTING OF ARTIFICIAL MATERIALS, KNIVES IN THE FIELD OF OPHTHALMOLOGY; MEDICAL APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY, INJECTION PENS IN THE NATURE OF INJECTION NEEDLES SOLD EMPTY; ORTHOPEDIC ARTICLES, NAMELY, VISCO SUPPLEMENT FOR JOINT INJECTIONS IN THE NATURE OF ARTIFICIAL IMPLANT MATERIAL IN GEL FORM; SUTURE MATERIALS; SYRINGES FOR MEDICAL PURPOSES; INTRAOCULAR LENSES; LENSES IN THE NATURE OF INTRAOCULAR PROSTHESES FOR SURGICAL IMPLANTATION; SURGICAL IMPLANTS COMPRISING ARTIFICIAL TISSUE; INGESTIBLE IMPLANTS CONSISTING OF HYALURONIC ACID BASED GEL IMPLANTS CONSISTING OF ARTIFICIAL MATERIALS FOR INJECTION, SOLD IN A PRE-FILLED SYRINGE, WITH OR WITHOUT A SPECIALLY DESIGNED INJECTION TOOL; INJECTION SYRINGES FOR MEDICAL, IN PARTICULAR DERMATOLOGICAL AND ORTHOPEDIC PURPOSES; INJECTABLE BIOPOLYMERS AND BIOPOLYMER GELS IN THE NATURE OF IMPLANTS CONSISTING OF ARTIFICIAL MATERIALS FOR USE IN THE FIELD OF COSMETOLOGY, AESTHETIC DERMATOLOGY, COSMETIC SURGERY, OPHTHALMOLOGY AND RHEUMATOLOGY | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Providing instruction and educational classes, workshops, seminars and lectures in the field of aesthetics, cosmetology and medicine | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Anteis S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Anteis S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named ANTEIS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 17, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 1, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 14, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 19, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 30, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 8, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2016 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 19, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 19, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 30, 2015 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 30, 2015 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 30, 2015 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 28, 2015 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 30, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 4, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2015 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |