Drawing for CRYOVAC ANGEL GUARD

USPTO serial 86608488

CRYOVAC ANGEL GUARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FINNEGAN, TIMOTHY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CRYOVAC ANGEL GUARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jayne Conway Hunter

Jayne Conway Hunter Hunter Law Firm, PLLC300 East Kingston AvenueSuite 200Charlotte, NC 28203

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Packaging machinery and structural partsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 17, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 17, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 14, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 12, 2018EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 12, 2018EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 12, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 12, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 10, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 10, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 10, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 14, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 13, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 12, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 30, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 30, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2018TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jan 30, 2018PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 30, 2018PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 18, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 15, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 11, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 9, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 9, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 9, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 9, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 5, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 5, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 20, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 20, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 31, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 18, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 12, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 8, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 8, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 8, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 8, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 8, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 8, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 8, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 11, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 11, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 11, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 18, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 18, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 18, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 21, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 20, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 5, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 28, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance