USPTO serial 86608661
PINCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CRENNAN, KEVIN GERARD
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PINCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Long Island City, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard J. Shire,
HOWARD J SHIRE KENYON & KENYON LLP1 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004-1007UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | Grocery delivery services, where the sales and delivery of the groceries are ordered online | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2017 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 8, 2017 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 8, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Sep 20, 2016 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2016 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2016 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 30, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 26, 2016 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2016 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2016 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2016 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 10, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 9, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 9, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 6, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 5, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |