Drawing for THE PENCIL GRIP

USPTO serial 86609741

THE PENCIL GRIP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GARTNER, JOHN M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE PENCIL GRIP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen E. Feldman

STEPHEN E FELDMAN FELDMAN LAW GROUP PC220 E 42ND ST STE 3304NEW YORK, NY 10017-5813UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Writing gripsACTIVEJan 1, 1992

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 12, 2017MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 12, 2017ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 12, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 13, 2017EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Mar 30, 2017GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2017GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2017CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Mar 29, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 29, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 24, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 8, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2017EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 8, 2017JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 8, 2017EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 8, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 8, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 8, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 19, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 18, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 18, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 18, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 17, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 16, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 16, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 13, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 4, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 6, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 28, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance