USPTO serial 86610029
FUTURE-CAST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MEYERS, MORGAN LAURA
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FUTURE-CAST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michelle Mancino Marsh
MICHELLE MANCINO MARSH ARENT FOX LLP1675 BROADWAY31ST FLNEW YORK, NY 10019Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | providing business consulting services in the nature of market and economic prediction, statistical analysis for business purposes and business risk assessment through collecting, compiling and analyzing domestic and international business, market, economic and financial data using proprietary computer algorithms and econometric models; diagnosis and prognosis of economic conditions, financial and investment opportunities and market fluctuations for business purposes, namely, market research and analysis; econometric analysis; providing business information in the nature of economic feasibility studies and market prediction studies; collection of economic, financial, business and market data for business purposes; conducting business research and surveys; economic forecasting; preparing business reports in the nature of economic and market prediction and forecasting; providing market analysis and information on domestic and international markets, industries and businesses, namely, market data and market research analysis and prediction services; providing business information in the nature of market prediction studies and economic feasibility studies; conducting financial surveys; preparing financial reports for others in the nature of economic and market data analysis, prediction and forecasting; the aforementioned services expressly excluding data and information related to weather forecasts | ACTIVE | Mar 3, 2015 |
| 036 | financial investment analysis and research; providing financial and investment consulting services in the nature of financial, financial statistical analysis and financial risk assessment through risk management and financial instrument design, collecting, compiling and analyzing business, market, economic and financial data using proprietary computer algorithms and econometric models; financial diagnosis and prognosis of economic conditions, financial investment opportunities and market fluctuations, namely, financial analysis; conducting financial research; providing financial information; providing financial and investment information in the nature of financial market and economic tracking indices; financial and economic research; the aforementioned services expressly excluding data and information related to weather forecasts | ACTIVE | Mar 3, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2016 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 8, 2016 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 8, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 26, 2016 | EXDM | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT | — |
| Jul 13, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 13, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 13, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 28, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 28, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 3, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 2015 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| May 23, 2015 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| May 23, 2015 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2015 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |