Drawing for LIGHTHOUSE MOLDING

USPTO serial 86610289

LIGHTHOUSE MOLDING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BOULTON, KELLY F
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LIGHTHOUSE MOLDING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Theodore J Minch

THEODORE J MINCH Sovich Minch Llp10500 Crosspoint BlvdIndianapolis, IN 46256-3331UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Plastic molding compounds for use in the manufacture of molded plastic articles; Unprocessed plastics for industrial use; Unprocessed polymer resins used in the manufacture of resin or fiber compositesACTIVEFeb 16, 2005
017Extruded plastic in the form of bars, blocks, pellets, rods, sheets and tubes for use in manufacturing; Films and sheets made from plastic for use in the manufacture of circuit boards; Films and sheets made from polymers for use in the manufacture of circuit boards; Films and sheets made out of epoxy resin for use in the manufacture of circuit boards; Plastic composite material in the form of profiles, boards, sheets, blocks, rods, powder, and pellets for use in manufacturing; Plastic in bars, blocks, pellets, rods, sheets and tubes in further manufacture for general industrial use; Plastic material in extruded form for use in productionACTIVEFeb 16, 2005
042Research and development of new products for third parties in the field of plastic materials; Testing, analysis and evaluation of materials, namely, metal, plastic and nylonACTIVEFeb 16, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 8, 2017PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Jan 27, 2017ERTPTEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED—
Dec 23, 2016PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Dec 22, 2016APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Dec 8, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 8, 2016PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 18, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 18, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 18, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 17, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 17, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 13, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 4, 2016NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
May 3, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 3, 2016PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 3, 2016PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 4, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 5, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 6, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 30, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance