Drawing for INDIVIDUAL TRIGGERMAP

USPTO serial 86612749

INDIVIDUAL TRIGGERMAP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHIH, SALLY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INDIVIDUAL TRIGGERMAP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nicole E. Reifman

NICOLE E. REIFMAN McDonnell Boehnen300 S Wacker Dr Ste 3200Chicago, IL 60606-6709UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041On-line computer services, namely, providing education services in the nature of informal on-line programs to consumers, providers, administrators and other participants in the healthcare industry in the field of healthcare via an on-line computer networkACTIVE—
042Database development services in the field of heath careACTIVE—
044Consulting services in the field of health and nutrition, namely, preventative health care, health promotion via providing information on maintaining a health lifestyle, and behavior modification to achieve improved health outcomes; providing a website featuring information on health and wellness including triggers for health issues; providing health care information via a global computer networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 11, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 10, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 8, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 12, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 12, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 24, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 30, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 19, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 19, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 19, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 19, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 9, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
May 8, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 1, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance