USPTO serial 86613123
CHRISTENI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ASKEW, MEGAN RUTH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHRISTENI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROMIN P. THOMSON
ROMIN P THOMSON SWEENEY MASON WILSON & BOSOMWORTH983 UNIVERSITY AVE STE 104CLOS GATOS, CA 95032-7637UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Wine | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2017 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 2, 2017 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 2, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 20, 2016 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Oct 4, 2016 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2016 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2016 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 29, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 13, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 13, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 14, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 14, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 13, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 16, 2015 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 29, 2015 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 17, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 25, 2015 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2015 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |