Drawing for PRO-VISION

USPTO serial 86614212

PRO-VISION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5211577Status 702Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 30, 2017
Examiner
FRYE, KIMBERLY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Status 702: Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use.

Need help with PRO-VISION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian E. Ainsworth

Brian E. Ainsworth PRICE HENEVELD LLP3400 Innovation Ct. SEP O Box 2567GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49501-2567

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic equipment for security and surveillance, namely, cameras, video cameras, switchers, video monitors, microphones, audio, video and data recorders, all for use with law enforcement, commercial vehicles, transit vehicles, and wearing on the body; mobile video equipment in the nature of cameras and two-way radios worn on the body, video cameras and recorders mounted on transportable structures; closed circuit television equipment for security and surveillance, namely, cameras, switchers, video monitors, microphones, audio, video and data recorders, all for use with law enforcement, commercial vehicles, transit vehicles, and wearing on the body; mobile video equipment in the nature of portable video and monitors, video cameras and recorders mounted on transportable structures; telecommunications equipment, namely, cables, switches, transmitters, transceivers; wearable camera mounts and supports; lights for use on video camerasACTIVEApr 1, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 30, 2026REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Jan 5, 2024NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jan 5, 2024C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Dec 26, 2023EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2023PUM1OFFICE ACTION ISSUED POU1—
Jun 26, 2023APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 25, 2023E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
May 30, 2022REM1COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2019ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 30, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 14, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 14, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 22, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 25, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 25, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 10, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 10, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 10, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 10, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 10, 2017JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 29, 2016JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 23, 2016GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Sep 23, 2016GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Sep 23, 2016CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Sep 16, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 16, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 10, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 2, 2016ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 2, 2016EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 2, 2016JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 2, 2016EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 7, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 7, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 7, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 12, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 11, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 11, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 12, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 11, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 2, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance