USPTO serial 86615492
Serial No. 86615492
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SINGH, TEJBIR
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 86615492?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard Mark Blank
19 Ledgewood CmnsMillwood, NY 10546-1026UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | All purpose athletic bags; All purpose carrying bags; All purpose sport bags; Amenity bags sold empty; Athletic bags; Backpacks; Barrel bags; Beach bags; Belt bags; Book bags; Boston bags; Bum bags; Cantle bags; Carry-all bags; Carry-on bags; Change purses; Charm bags; Clutch bags; Clutch purses; Clutches; Coin purses; Cosmetic bags sold empty; Courier bags; Diaper bags; Dolly bags; Dry bags; Duffel bags; Duffle bags; Evening bags; Evening handbags; Fashion handbags; Flight bags; Garment bags for travel; Gladstone bags; Grip bags; Gym bags; Handbags; Hip bags; Hobo bags; Key bags; Kit bags; Knitted bags; Leather and imitation leather bags; Luggage; Make-up bags sold empty; Messenger bags; Multi-purpose purses; Overnight bags; Pochettes; Pocketbooks; Pouches; Purses; Roll bags; School bags; Shaving bags sold empty; Shoe bags for travel; Textile shopping bags; Shoulder bags; Sling bags; Small clutch purses; Small purses; Souvenir bags; Sports bags; Suit bags; Toiletry bags sold empty; Tote bags; Travel bags; Traveling bags; Waist bags; Wallets; Wheeled bags; Wrist mounted purses; Wristlet bags; Light up clutch bags; Light up handbags; Light up make-up bags sold empty; Light up shoulder bags; Light up pocketbooks; Light up purses; Light up pouches for holding keys; Lit clutch bags; Lit handbags; Lit make- up bags sold empty; Lit shoulder bags; Lit pocketbooks; Lit purses; Lit pouches for holding keys; RFID blocking clutch bags; RFID blocking handbags; RFID blocking make-up bags sold empty; RFID blocking shoulder bags; RFID blocking pocketbooks; RFID blocking purses; RFID blocking pouches for holding keys; Illuminated clutch bags; Illuminated handbags; Illuminated make-up bags sold empty; Illuminated shoulder bags; Illuminated pocketbooks; Illuminated purses; Illuminated pouches for holding keys | ACTIVE | Jun 25, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 3, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 10, 2016 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2016 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2016 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 19, 2016 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2016 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 16, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 13, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 2015 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |