Drawing for BACK TO THE ROOTS

USPTO serial 86616161

BACK TO THE ROOTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ZIMMERMAN, GAYNNE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BACK TO THE ROOTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dawn Newton

DAWN NEWTON DONAHUE FITZGERALD LLP1999 HARRISON ST FL 25OAKLAND, CA 94612-3520UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Breakfast toppings, namely, mixes consisting primarily of dried fruits, processed nuts, processed edible seeds, and/or processed coconut, and also including processed buckwheat and granolaACTIVEFeb 26, 2015
030Breakfast cerealsACTIVEFeb 26, 2015

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 11, 2017ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 9, 2017MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 5, 2017ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 5, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 5, 2016EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Sep 27, 2016GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Sep 27, 2016GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Sep 27, 2016CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Sep 22, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 22, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 13, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 6, 2016ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2016EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 6, 2016JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 6, 2016EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 4, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 4, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 4, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 17, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 16, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 16, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 8, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 12, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 4, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance