USPTO serial 86617616
GP THUNDER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5038921Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 13, 2016
- Examiner
- PARKER, JUSTINE D
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GP THUNDER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ONTARIO, CA, US
City of Industry, CA, US
City of Industry, CA, US
City of Industry, CA, US
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Automobile light bulbs; Lighting apparatus for vehicles; Vehicle headlights; Vehicle turn-signal light bulbs | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Aug 25, 2008 |
| 035 | Computerized on-line retail store services in the field of lighting apparatus for vehicles; On-line retail consignment stores featuring lighting apparatus for vehicles; On-line retail store services featuring lighting apparatus for vehicles | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Aug 25, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PREMIERTEK
- Other trademarks owned by Sheng-Yi Chang
- Other trademarks owned by Sheng-Yi Chang
- Other trademarks owned by Sheng-Yi Chang
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named GP THUNDER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2026 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| May 10, 2024 | CRAF | AMENDMENT CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2023 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 22, 2022 | CCCN | COUNTERCLAIM CANC. NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 26, 2022 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2021 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 28, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 8, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 19, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 28, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 13, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 13, 2016 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 13, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 14, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 17, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |