USPTO serial 86617949
SKY BEDDING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4880312Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 5, 2016
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SKY BEDDING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Idaho Falls, ID
Idaho Falls, ID
Idaho Falls, ID
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel Watkins
DANIEL WATKINS Peck Hadfield Baxter & Moore Llc399 N Main St Ste 300Logan, UT 84321-3993UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Beds, mattresses, pillows and bolsters; Mattress foundations; Mattress toppers; Sleep products, namely, mattresses, spring mattresses, box springs and mattress foundations; Spring mattresses | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Sep 15, 2014 |
| 024 | Bed linen; Bed sheets; Bed sheets, fitted bed sheet covers, bed flat sheets, and pillow cases used in the bedding, health care, home-health care and nursing home industries made of biodegradable film created from renewable bio-polymer resources; Bedsheets; Children's bed sheets, pillow cases, and blankets; Fitted bed sheets; Flat bed sheets; Mattress covers; Mattress pads; Pillow cases; Pillow covers | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Sep 15, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2016 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Apr 30, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 29, 2016 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2016 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 20, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 30, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 17, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 24, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 24, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 20, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |