Drawing for EVERY TOUCH IS A STEP FORWARD

USPTO serial 86619757

EVERY TOUCH IS A STEP FORWARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VOHRA, SANJEEV KUMAR
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EVERY TOUCH IS A STEP FORWARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marci A. Blazer

MARCI A. BLAZER Johnson and Johnson Corp1 Johnson and Johnson PlzNew Brunswick, NJ 08933-0002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Insulin delivery devices, namely, insulin infusion pumps and insulin delivery patches sold without medication, catheters, pen needles, syringes, and needle inserters; portable apparatus for transdermal administration of medicaments, namely, insulin delivery patch sold without medication; medical devices, namely, medicament administration monitors that utilize alerts and reminders; medical devices for transdermal administration of medicaments, namely, portable apparatus for transdermal medicaments, namely, insulin delivery patch sold without medications; parts for medical devices, namely, cannulas sold as a unit with the medical apparatus for transdermal administration of medicaments and sold separatelyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 21, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 21, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 3, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 29, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 29, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 29, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 18, 2017NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Apr 18, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 17, 2017DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 5, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 5, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 3, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 20, 2017DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2017ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 18, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 23, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 3, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 18, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 13, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 13, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 12, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 24, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2016ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 7, 2016PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
May 23, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 17, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 27, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 27, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 26, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 26, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 13, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 13, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 13, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 7, 2016ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 8, 2016PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Feb 25, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 25, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 25, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 25, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 25, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 5, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 4, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 4, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 15, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 15, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 15, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 7, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 14, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 8, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance