Drawing for ZIPHIRE

USPTO serial 86622882

ZIPHIRE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RITTNER, HANNO I
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ZIPHIRE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Perry J. Viscounty

JULIE DALKE Latham & Watkins Llp650 Town Center Dr Ste 2000Costa Mesa, CA 92626-7135UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009(Based on Intent to Use) downloadable templates and forms for providing a self-service employee portal to manage employee information in the field of employment recruiting and hiringACTIVE—
035(Based on Intent to Use) providing an internet website portal featuring information in the field of employment recruiting and hiringACTIVEJan 28, 2015
041(Based on Intent to Use) providing online non-downloadable publications in the nature of recruiting templates and forms in the field of employment recruiting and hiringACTIVE—
042(Based on Use in Commerce) providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for use in online personnel recruiting and hiring; computer services, namely, providing an interactive website featuring technology that allows temporary non-downloadable use of templates and forms in the field of employment recruiting and hiring for automating the entry and use of employee and employer recruiting informationACTIVEJan 28, 2015

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 9, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 9, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 7, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 12, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 12, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 23, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 7, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 1, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 29, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 29, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 26, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 19, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 19, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 19, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 19, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 16, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 11, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance