USPTO serial 86622893
THERMOCOPPER NITI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THERMOCOPPER NITI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey A. Smith
Jeffrey A. Smith Millen-White2200 Clarendon BoulevardSuite 1400Arlington, VA 22201-3360Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Orthodontic appliances and dental instruments, namely, facial arch wires and pre-shaped facial arch wires, NiTi (nickel titanium) wires, thermo-activated wires, grooved wires, lip wires and lip-active plates; orthodontic appliances and dental instruments, namely, dental wires, twist flex dental wires, orthodontic lingual bars, elastic hard dental wires, tie wire, soft wire and brass wire; orthodontic appliances and dental instruments, namely, elastic rings and separating rings, chain rings and rotator rings; dental accessories and auxiliary appliances, namely, lingual buttons, surgical hooks, ball clasps, palatal bars and quad helix expanders, clampers in the nature of clamps for surgical use, pins for artificial teeth, distalization appliances, namely, dental instruments for use in molar distalization, locking meshes and springs; dental and orthodontic appliances and instruments, namely, hard wires used in orthodontics and rings used in dentition; all of the foregoing consisting in part of copper and nickel titanium | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 25, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 14, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 14, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 14, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 23, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 19, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 2, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 2, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 27, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 26, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 17, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 7, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 1, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 1, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 17, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 18, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |